The ultimate Iraqi insult

Atta Boy Bush Baby, Way to go
I don't know if anybody knows about Islam or Iraqi culture but the ultimate insult is to throw a shoe at someone. It is the same as if someone threw a bottle of waste from a pail on a person from an upstairs window as they are walking by their house. In their culture is extremely rude to show your feet and throwing your shoes at a person is the ultimate insult. Apparently Mr. Bush is not liked by anyone anymore. You may just want to watch the video several times because of first time the journalist missed Mr. Bush and the second time (although they say he may not have been hit) it looks as though the shoe brushed by him skinning him within millimeters. I guess it just shows you how far Mr. Bush has sunk in his world wide ratings. This is from "I just thought you'd like to know"as part of my blog.

Wisconsin GOP shame on you

Is this the best you can do?

The Wisconsin GOP must be getting desperate because I just received a glossy piece in the mail trying to link William Ayres and 1960s one time weather underground terrorist with Barak Obama. They try to make it sound like this is a true story that Mr. Obama has close ties to domestic terrorist is a heading on the inside page. Inside of this glossy brochure are a pile of lies are pictures of the 1960s protests having to do with the Vietnam war. There's only one problem with this glossy advertisement that they purposely failed to tell us that Barak Obama at the time was only eight years old when all this happened. Now I don't know about you though when I was eight years old I wasn't very much interested in anything except Cowboys and Indians riding my bike and maybe playing basketball. I probably knew about the war, but I really didn't care about it. After all when is the last time you ever saw an eight-year-old kid drafted into the Army? What they also fail to tell you is that the only way that Mr. Obama got to know Mr. Ayres is through a local youth group similar to the Boys and Girls Club that both of them alonged to.

I've got news for the Republican Party of Wisconsin, we aren't as dumb as you think we are! We've grown weary of the scare tactics and all the lies spread by the GOP and the Bush administration and the never ending efforts to control the minds and thoughts of the American public. Guess what? We learned a lot in the last eight years and were not going to fall for that stuff anymore. It seems to me like you guys are getting desperate that you are losing ground rapidly because we can see through all your twisted rhetoric and lies and were not falling for it anymore.

So boys and girls take that for what it's worth I just wanted you to know what the real truth is and the kind of lies the GOP is trying to feed you. I predict that the presidential election is going to be a landslide. And believe me it's not McCain who is going to be in the winning circle. With that I urge each and every one of you to get out and vote because this is a very important election. I know I will be out there, even though I am recuperating from spinal surgery I hope to be recovered enough to go cross the street and vote on election day. Believe me if I can do it so can you.

Report: McCain Exploded With Rage During Gambling Outing

Report: McCain Exploded With Rage During Gambling Outing

How about this one? It seems to have been glossed over by almost everybody including the press. Do we really need John McCain as president with somebody who is known to have an explosive temper? Read the article and then watch the video. And make a decision for yourself whether you would want to have somebody who explodes the way Mr. McCain did with very little provocation. I certainly don't think I want somebody as president who acts like that. I don't get me wrong I don't see anything wrong with gambling although I don't do it myself. I think it's a waste of my hard earned dollars. The only times I've ever been to a gambling hall has been to attend a show but never to gamble. But that's beside the point.

Mr. McCain comes across as very controlled, calm cool and collected during his many debates and this is what is being shown on TV to the American public. This is the persona he wants to project as a public image, but what we don't see behind the scenes is a very explosive Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde persona that he so carefully hides. This is what he does not want you to see. Like Gov. Palin this is a personality trait I don't want anyone to ever have was going to be in such a high public office such as the president of the United States. Here again I ask the same question, what would happen if he blew up when confronted with a very volatile situation? Politically and internationally we cannot afford this type of outburst because the consequences would be disastrous. And my question once again, is do you want somebody like this as president? Your comments are always welcome.

In Dozens of Calls, Palins Pressed for Trooper’s Removal - NYTimes.com

In Dozens of Calls, Palins Pressed for Trooper’s Removal - NYTimes.com

There's nothing like a woman scorned. I just found this article in the New York Times and think it's rather interesting about Gov. Palin. I don't know about you but I don't know if I'd want to have somebody like that in office who holds a grudge the way she does and the way her family does. I've had bosses like that. They tend to be vindicative when they can't get their own way and it seems like a trait that Ms. Palin has shown to the public in a way that says to me at least, that she is not the type of person I would want as a vice president or even as the president should that ever happen.

One of the things that I've noticed in heterosexual marriages or should I say divorces is that one or the other party or both parties usually wind up hating each other and become very vindictive during the course of their divorce and especially if there are children involved. Although most people tend to overlook this it is a very common trait amongst many many people. To me it shows a much darker side to Ms. Palen that I think every one should know about and take into consideration if you want her leading our country. I guess one of the questions I would have is how vindictive she would be if she could not get her way in the position of either vice president or president? This would leave me to question her stability and capacity to lead a country. I do not want an unstable person in office ever. And I certainly don't want somebody who's going to go off half cocked or who might become unstable under pressure.

Heaven help us if she was forced into a position of authority and something really bad happened to our country. I don't want somebody who's going to be come vindictive or explosive in a highly volatile situation. This I am afraid can lead to very direct consequences and possibly even lead us into a world war or some sort of nuclear confrontation which I don't think anyone wants to see happen. Anyone who is elected president or vice president must be very stable and I don't know if they're psychological profile shows that. And I really think that this is something that should be looked into and very carefully considered. I don't think that this is the proper type of behavior that I want to have for somebody in a high office and I don't think you do either. It sure would be nice to know what other people think. So if you would like to leave a comment please do so.

Deregulation is the problem

This may be a short post, but I think or should I say I know that the problem is deregulation. Under the Bush administration most of the stuff has happened has been caused by the deregulation of most industries especially the banking industry and mortgage industry. I would strongly suggest that the next president whoever he may be, including Congress and the Senate implement regulatory measures on our financial industries. The problem with deregulation is that it has allowed those greedy people who are thinking nothing but how much money they can make by any means possible that has caused all these problems. A we need laws to stop the hemorrhaging of the financial industry and we need checks and balances to regulate our banks, our mortgage industry, and the stock market. We especially need to regulate, or at least put on the brakes on short sales and on futures within the stock markets. This is precisely what is driving up the price of oil and gasoline. By putting a cap on the futures market we can regulate the wild fluctuations in our gasoline prices and oil prices. This is critical to the stabilization of our economy.

Secondly I think it is imperative that we demand that the countries we are spending billions of dollars in like a Iraq and Afghanistan which has a huge surplus of oil reserves. Instead of asking them to pay back with dollars we should demand that they pay us back with the oil reserves that they already have. This in turn would alleviate some of our oil problems. Of course this will not solve the problem but it will help it somewhat.

Thirdly we need to develop new sources of energy especially renewable energy. It is critical that we get away from fossil fuels such as coal and oil. We need to turn to alternative energy sources especially organic sources. Although many people will squawk, I think wind energy is one of the ways that we can go to produce electricity. Also I think that atomic energy is another way to go. Although with atomic energy we also need to know how to reprocess it so that it can either be used over again or we need to find better ways to store spent fuel in as safe a manner as possible until we can devise a way to use it once again. I am sure that as our technology progresses and it seems to be happening logarithmically, that we will be able sometime in the not-too-distant future to find a way to reprocess spent uranium that we use our power plants. Perhaps by the knowledge we gain from the hadron collider that we may be able to develop some sort of propulsion system to be used in outer space. Perhaps sometime in the future we may learn through our use of quantum physics how-to use uranium or its byproducts in space travel. Who knows, we may even develop some sort of warp drive for spaceships. You never know. Right now that may seem like science fiction but in the not-too-distant future it may become science fact.

The other possibility is to use battery powered vehicles. But first we need to develop a much more efficient electrical storage system for those vehicles. They need to be much lighter and more efficient than the batteries we now use. Instead of using wet cells perhaps we can develop a dry cell battery or batteries that can be recharged over and over. They also need to hold their charge longer so that we are able to drive farther without having to plug the car in to recharge it. Another thing is that we can also use solar energy which unfortunately at this time is pretty expensive, but I think if we can develop new technology to increase the efficiency of solar energy collectors this may also become a viable source of energy especially in the home.

We need to also build a more energy efficient houses in order to conserve our energy usage. We need to develop new materials that provide much better insulation for our homes. The better insulated our homes are the more energy efficient they will be both during the summer and the winter. We need to develop systems to both heat and cool our homes much more efficiently than the systems we are currently using. We could possibly even use a solar heating and cooling system combination that would be used in the summer to cool our homes and into winter to heat it. That my friends is my take on the situation.

Seven billion-dollar bailout defeated

House Narrowly Defeats Bailout Legislation - washingtonpost.com



Is it a surprise, I don't think so. As I explained in one of my posts before I really didn't want to see this pass because it may have been a blank check to bail out the greedy financial institutions and possibly let executives get off Scott free. I'll say it again and again, we need government oversight and we also need government regulation, not deregulation. That's how this whole thing got going in the first place. It is my opinion that deregulation and unmitigated greed by not only executives and high up positions but investors looking to make a quick buck.

If they do put something forward again, I think it has to contain checks and balances similar to our Constitution so that this does not happen again. What was the old saying, "history repeats itself", how true that is.

I certainly hope something can be hammered out otherwise our economy is in(pardon my French) the toilet. Unfortunately now is the time that people are going to start the blame game. First it was Nancy Pelosi and it will be somebody else and another person after that because no one wants to take responsibility. That is the crux of the problem. That's why we are where we are at this point in time. We have to take responsibility for what we do if we do not do that then we're going to have history repeat itself.

Now more than ever, it is very important that those people in the house and congress get together and construct a plan which checks and balances, and not just a blank check, to fix the problem. I don't even want to think of what will happen if they don't. And I'm sure neither do you. So let's not go away with our tails between our legs, but instead let us pick ourselves up by the bootstraps, square our shoulders and march back in and hammer out a deal.

The TV Watch - Beyond Ideology, a Generational Clash - NYTimes.com

I watched the debate last night was red interesting how Mr. McCain kept telling Mr. Obama that he didn't seem to get it, or or I'm afraid Mr. Obama does not understand. It seems like the same old thing when an older person talks to younger person and they assume that the younger person doesn't really understand the situation which couldn't be farther from the truth. You but Mr. McCain doesn't understand is that we need a new blood and new views from whoever is elected as president and I'm sorry to say(pardon my French) he's an older part with old ideas that just don't hack it.

Almost anyone could tell that Mr. Obama also much younger than Mr. McCain is very smart and very knowledgeable about current situations. McCain and I believe will more likely use his own private experience rather than the advice of those around him to deal with government situations and foreign-policy. Mr. Obama on the other hand, not having as much experience will more likely to end to research and get information from people in government positions who are knowledgeable in that situation. I think Mr. Obama has some of the traits of Ronald Reagan who as we all know was a great orator and actor and he also was well aware that he did not have all the knowledge necessary. So he surrounded himself with a much smarter people who could have eyes him on the situation at hand and therefore make an informed decision. I think Mr. Obama, as smart as he is, will do the same. I doubt very much if you go off half cocked. When a situation arises I believe that he will explore all avenues and determine what strategy he will take in that situation.

Even I will admit that I don't know everything and I will be the first to admit it. If I don't know the answer to something I will tell you that I will get back to you and give you a good answer. In the meantime I will research the question or situation as the case may be and eventually come up with a good answer. It's like playing chess, there is the opening game, the middle game and the endgame. When a situation arises like chess we must first decide what our opening move will be. The other opponent then will make his next move. At this point we must analyze all possibilities and the effects any of these possible moves will eventually effect the outcome we desire. Unfortunately Mr. Obama did not come in at the beginning of the game (the Iran Iraq war) but if elected president he is stuck in the middle game where he must analyze every move so that we can move to the endgame(hopefully the end of the war) and we hope of victory. Or should I say at least stability in the Middle East.

As far as the economy is concerned, that in itself is going to be quite a challenge. I think Mr. Obama is well aware of the situation and I am sure he will surround himself with financial experts and strategists who will come up with a viable solution to this current awful situation. We the public and taxpayers do not want to see our money being thrown away or worse squandered and not realize some sort of solution. Right now no one knows how the bailout is going to work because that is up to Congress and the Senate to decide. Hopefully the solution will have enough safeguards in it in order to prevent any further catastrophe. Only time will tell.

Personally I think Obama came out ahead. I hope you feel the same way.

McCain will go to debate - Mike Allen and Daniel W. Reilly - Politico.com

McCain will go to debate - Mike Allen and Daniel W. Reilly - Politico.com

I don't know if you guys can believe what has been said in the news and on TV while I watched the government channel when they were getting up to debate the bailout, several of those who got up concurred and said John McCain should not be in Washington attending the debates. Instead he should go back and prepare for the debate with Mr. Obama. It is obvious that what he is doing is bringing his presidential campaign, which he should not be doing, to the House of Representatives and Congress.

I don't know about you but this sounds to me like he's losing ground and is trying to make up for it by grandstanding. This is neither the time nor the place to do anything like this. Instead I think you and I should watch the debate tonight this Friday night and see who really has their act together. I guess that's all I want to put on his blog right now because it is more important to see what happens tonight. I can assure you I will let you know what I think tomorrow, or sooner as the case may be.

700 billion dollar bail out, nothing but government garbage

Personally I am completely against a government bailout of financial institutions because they should have known better that the mortgages they financed were bad to begin with and they should take responsibility for those bad loans. Instead we have the mentality that says "the devil made me do it"type of mentality where no one wants to take responsibility for what they do. The only thing it does is going to help other financial institutions not the American public. As a landlord for over 30 years experience, I regularly check people's credit reports to make sure that they can pay the rent. Not only that I check them out in the courts to see if they have been evicted recently or how bad they have been otherwise. All of these things I take into account to determine if I will rent to them. First of all they had to meet my minimum financial qualifications and secondly if they were evicted it has to be at least over three years ago. They must also have a fairly clean criminal record concerning drugs or violence etc. If they don't meet these criteria, they don't get the rent from me.

Apparently banks and financial institutions never checked people's financial or credit reports to determine whether they were capable of making mortgage payments on their housing loans. Unscrupulous mortgage brokers were granting loans to anyone who walked into the office regardless of their credit history neither they nor the banks and financial institutions including those institutions that ensure these loans ever did their homework. And now unfortunately we have a plethora of foreclosures.

What I really can't believe is that the government wants to bail out these financial institutions. If these companies made bad loans they must pay for it one way or the other including going into bankruptcy. I don't think the American public should have to pay for this. I don't want my tax dollars bailing out some financial institutions bad decision. I think it's garbage. My suggestion instead is to let these companies go under and instead use the money wisely to help those in need keep their homes. I think those people who are disabled or retired or had excessive medical bills that have caused them to go into debt and not able to pay their mortgage payments and therefore put them into foreclosure should be helped first. Other people should meet certain criteria in order to be helped. In this way we protect ourselves from the scam artists and other unscrupulous people looking for freebies. In closing I do not think this bill should pass as it stands. And I strongly think that the financial institutions who were the cause of this debacle should pay the price, up to and including bankruptcy. Let the chips fall where they may.

YouTube - A Palin McCain Administration?

YouTube - A Palin McCain Administration?: ""
well I guess we know who the boss will be if and when McCain is elected. It looks to me like she wants to take the reins. Sorry to say Mrs. Palin, but that is not what the vice president does. I think someone is going to have to explain to her all about the presidency and how it works. Obviously she seems to me to be clueless. Either that or she thinks the American public is incredibly stupid. Such is life.

Sarah Palin’s Yahoo account hijacked Important Update

Sarah Palin’s Yahoo account hijacked, e-mails posted online Zero Day ZDNet.com

Well it finally happened Sarah Palin's private e-mail got hacked. Apparently she was trying to get around the law having to do with open records by using a private e-mail account to do just that. This morning when I got my e-mail I saw the article on ZDNet and copied webpages for everyone to see. I don't think any official government or otherwise should do such underhanded things such as this. I have posted the pictures for you to see to make your own decision on what you think of Sarah Palin.

The below update is taken from WikiLeaks.

One of the accounts of screenshots shows a short exchange in July between Gov. Palin and Lt. Gov. Sean Parnell, who is running against Democrat Ethan Berkowitz for the state's lone Congressional seat. In her reply, Palin called Anchorage-based conservative radio host Dan Fagan "inconsistent and purposefully misleading" in his comments about Parnell.

Another screenshot displays the text of a message to Palin from Amy McCorkell, who Palin appointed to the Governor's Advisory Board on Alcoholism and Drug Abuse in October 2007. According to a press release issued by Palin's office at the time, McCorkell, like Palin, lives in Wasilla, Alaska and is formerly a private legal investigator, an office worker and fitness instructor.

In the message dated Sunday, McCorkell said: "I am reading the paper and have thoughts and prayers going your way......don't let the negative press wear you down! Pray for me as well. I need strength to 1. keep employment, 2. not have to choose. Lately I just pray may God's will be done."

Later this afternoon as I watched CNN they were saying that they will probably start an investigation into the firing of the state trooper and also some of the mails archived that she has been sending via the Yahoo account. I would not be surprised that there are other government officials doing the same type of thing to get around the freedom of information act. It would be very interesting to find out how many others are doing this also.

It's been covered on the news but I don't know how many of them have shown the screenshots of the e-mails? I think the world should know, don't you? Of course when I find out more I will let you know. I have to give credit where credit is due, most of the screenshots were taken from WikiLeak.org.

Women in the White House

Would I like to see a woman in a white house? Of course I would. The only problem I have with Hillary Clinton is that she doesn't know when to hold them and when to fold them. The other thing I don't trust is her husband. Can he or will he be able to stand back and keep his nose out of what happens in the White House? That is the question. That I am sure is the reason why Mr. Obama did not choose Hillary as his running mate.

It's not so much that I don't like Hillary Clinton because she is a extremely smart woman and very good when it comes to politics. It's her husband I don't trust. While with Junior and Senior Bush, Bush Senior kept his nose out of juniors presidency. My worry is that if Hillary was chosen as VP would Bill keep his nose out of their affairs?

As for Sarah Palen, I am not against her as VP. She probably will make a very good running mate with John McCain. I agree she is smart but she doesn't have the experience that her opponent has. This I see as a serious drawback. I really think he needs more time in the political arena and especially when it comes to foreign affairs to gain the necessary experience to be the vice president of the United States. At this point in time should something happen to John McCain her inexperience could prove to be disastrous. That is my only worry.

In a newspaper article a couple days ago the McCain camp was disappointed that Obama had not decided to choose Clinton as his running mate. And as you know of course, I read between the lines, and what I saw was a disappointment in having a good cat fight had Clinton been chosen. Instead Mr. Obama chose Joe Biden for the vice presidential position, someone with many years experience both here and abroad. And I am sorry to say there is no way Sarah Palin can go up against that. Joe Biden can run circles around Sarah Palin. We all know that, and that's a fact.

Would I eventually like to see a woman as president? I think someday that will happen, but not right now. There is one difference I see between Clinton and Palin and that is Palin seems to have a sense of humor, something I didn't see with Mrs. Clinton. Maybe I'm missing something but I think that somebody who wants to run for public office not only needs to have a serious side but also had a good sense of humor. Any good public speaker worth his or her salt will mix in just the right amount of humor to get their point across.

Obama instead of choosing Clinton nas VP he chose Joe Biden. When this happened they (the women voters) became extremely disappointed and when Mr. McCain decided to put in Sarah Palin as his running mate this I see was the perfect opportunity to steal the women's vote. Whether this was a good strategy only time will tell. I think what we need to do now is to put on our thinking caps and carefully analyze the situation rather than letting our emotions get the better of us. Like it or not we have to choose the most qualified candidates.

Don't you think it's about time that Joe Biden got out there and kicked some butt? Come on guy shown what you're made of. Let's run circles around these people. I know you can do it. .

Who are we electing John McCain or his sidekick Sarah Palin?

Howard Kurtz - The ABCs of Sarah Palin - washingtonpost.com

Yes who are we really electing John McCain or his sidekick Sarah Palin? It seems to me that we should be concentrating more on John McCain than Sarah Palin, don't you think? To put more emphasis on someone who has absolutely no experience, other than being the governor of Alaska and a small town at that. She has absolutely no experience in foreign affairs whatsoever. Besides my question to you is what is she going to do once John McCain is elected? From my experience most vice presidents don't do much of anything except go around the country as a cheer leader and nothing more. I don't know about you, but I don't think I want anyone as a vice president with as little experience as this woman has.

The only reason John McCain has decided to have Sarah Palin run for the vice presidency (sidekick) is because of the importance that Mrs. Clinton had on women voters. This is what the McCain campaign is striving for, nothing more than stealing the women's vote and nothing less. Obviously many women were disappointed in Hillary Clinton's loss for the presidential nomination. They were also very disappointed when Hillary was not chosen as VP. So what did John McCain do? Search for the next best thing, a woman who could steal votes from the Obama campaign.

But just who are we electing? John McCain or Sarah Palin? Perhaps they think that the American public is incredibly stupid. I think on the other hand that the American public is far from stupid. I don't think that this strategy of trying to manipulate people is going to work. After all, we went through eight years with the Bush administration and I don't think we want to go another 4 to 8 years with John McCain. Because in my humble opinion I think he is a Bush clone. Oh yeah, he comes across as a nice guy, but is he actually the maverick he claims to be? I don't think so. Obama stresses change. John McCain says I'm going to change things too. But will he really? Or will he succumb to the policies that were and are so popular with the Bush administration?

I think the American people have got to wake up to the reality that we definitely do need change and the sooner the better. Although some would like to see us leave Afghanistan and Iraq and the war behind, that is not possible, not after Bush Junior came in like the cowboy he is with Shock and Awe and completely destabilized Iraq. Now we are stuck trying to fix what we messed up and unfortunately I think it's going to take a long time to get that done. We may be able to pull some troops out, but not all of them. It is a sad fact that we have been trying for years to get Iraq off its behind and start doing something for themselves. The reality is we are working with people with very little education and very little motivation and a whole lot of fear. Neither we nor they can drive down the road without being in mortal fear of getting blown up. Unfortunately it's really hard to get someone out there to fight for themselves when it is so dangerous. The reality is that there is un-exploded ordinance everywhere. Photojournalists have all too graphically shown us the devastation this has done to woman and children who have either lost her legs or limb. So the reality is no matter who gets elected we can't just leave.

Even I wavered back and forth wondering who was the best choice for president. Yes Mr. McCain has his strong points and so does Mr. Obama. Personally I think Mr. McCain made a very bad mistake with Sarah Palin. Picking someone simply to get the women's vote and that is not the way to go. Not only that she is very inexperienced. Obama on the other hand has chosen as his running mate a very experienced person with years of foreign policy experience. I believe Mr. Obama is extremely smart, and I don't think that he would hesitate like past president Ronald Reagan, to ask for the best possible choice or should I say the most experienced people to run his administration. I think Mr. Obama will look for the best and the brightest as his advisers. The question is, can we say the same thing for Mr. McCain? There again do the Republicans need a woman sidekick that history has shown leans toward the religious right? The American people are sick and tired of the rhetoric of the religious right and we don't need any more of that. Or do we want someone like Mr. Obama, regardless of his race, who is most likely to use other people best qualified for the job? That is the choice we have to make.

Why Gas prices are so high

Do you really want to know why the prices of gasoline are so high? Here it is. Think 9/11, that is thew key. After 9/11 the USA froze all money sources of the Iraq's and other hostile Arab country's. Militarily they know they can"t beat us. They are also not Dumb either. Remember they want us out of their country. Its like the Mouse Thar Roared. What better way to beat us but to cripple us. Hit us where it hurts. In the Pocketbook. A simple case of Supply and Demand. Believe me, they have it all figured out and don't think for one minute that the other Arab countries aren't in on it either. You can bank on that. Not only that, we had a stupid and clueless President who had to go to war with guns blazing with no plan what so ever.
Point number Two. Do you remember World War Two? Then you should also remember that we had supply problems getting needed supplies to our troops and this almost crippled us. Fortunately we solved that problem and we went on to win the war. Guess what? History repeats itself. Here is the REAL REASON gas prices are so high. The Arab nations are purposely restricting the supply of gasoline in order to artificially raise the prices sky high in order to cripple us and the war effort. Several other things they won't tell you and won't do anything about (greed my friends) is the futures market. That and the oil companies unwillingness to reinvest in critical refineries and machinery.

The other thing we can blame is our stupid elected officials who can't see the forest through the trees. Many of them cow-tow to oil company lobbyists and greedy investors. What they need to do is put a CAP on how much can be invested on oil futures. That will fix part of the problem. Secondly we need an EXIT strategy in place to get us out of Iraq and other oil producing country's. The sooner the better. Remember, THEY DON"T WANT US IN THEIR COUNTRY.

I'm screaming it from the rooftop. Why isn't anybody listening? How stupid can we be?

Puppetry of the Penis and the Religious Right

Oh My God
Puppetry of the Penis
and the outrage of the
Religious Right
An ad was placed in the Weekend Cue Section of the Journal Sentinel and the Religious Right went bonkers. How dare they post an ad for the Puppetry of the Penis called the Re-Erection Tour? I suppose they think that this blasphemy's the Resurrection of Jesus Christ on Sunday. Personally I think their timing is perfect and the Religious Right who by the way are anything but is brilliant. Of course somehow they trying to spin it around to include the Homosexual Agenda, intimating that this is part of our agenda. How stupid can they be? This is a show by heterosexuals primarily for heterosexuals. Leave it to the progressive English to come up with something so totally sacrilegious.

Boys and Girls this is the free advertising they are looking for.
Hooray for the Stupid People
You religious morons
You fell for it Hook Line and Sinker
Way to go (wink)

Here's a link to the You Tube Ad
Enjoy

I dont know about you but I woulden't miss this one for the world.

Obama and his Minister a Theory

Someone is playing dirty politics trying to use the race card to discredit Mr Obama. We know that the Clinton Camp is getting desperate and has been known to use dirty tricks to discredit Mr Obama. One of her associates was fired when the press found out about it.

McCain's camp has been very quiet lately. Too quiet is you ask me. Occam's razor points to the Clinton Camp but it also hints at McCain. In that sense I would eliminate McCain. Either way he has to run against one or the other.

My choice is Clinton. The reason is that the race is way too close. No one is squeaky clean and Obama certainly is no angel. Its just that he is smart and never got himself in any trouble that would cause irreparable harm to his political career.

So why not dig up some fire and brimstone minister and play the race card. Prejudice still runs deep in parts of our country and many African Americans especially older ones still deep down inside harbor anger and even deep seated hatred for the way they were treated during the 50"s and 60's. It is unfortunate that his type of thing still exists, but it does whether we like it or not.

I sincerely hope that the Right Wing Bigot gets caught and prosecuted. This country needs change desperately and Mr Obama may just be the one to do it. The big question still remains, did the minister do it without thinking or did someone pay him off to do it. Only time will tell.